Prior to being a personal trainer Carlsbad, in the spring of 1991 I had been finishing my freshman year of studying engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. One early morning my science professor went through a problem struggling with the First Law of Thermodynamics (also referred to as the conservation of energy). I did not know it during that time, but that morning would help figure my assumption years later that low-intensity “aerobic” activities are “exercises in futility.”
My professor showed how to measure how many vertical feet you would need to climb as a way to lose the number of calories in a McDonald’s meal of a Big Mac, fries, and smoothie. Calories in food are a measure of chemical energy, and that chemical energy could be transformed into other forms like the kinetic energy of moving your body or heat energy that warms you. Take that meal from McDonald’s. I just looked at their internet site, and it determines that between the Big Mac, fried potatoes, and huge drink, that snack currently contains a total of 2,150 calories. My teacher presumed a 25% performance of the human body transforming the food calories into useable force (the other 75% will be dissipated as wasted heat), and assessed how significant those calories would raise somebody upward if 25% were changed into the potential force of raising a mass against the power of gravity.
Brushing up on my simple science equations in order to publish this article, I re-did the same calculations my professor applied and calculated that a 150 pound person consuming the above McDonald’s meal has to climb 11,054 feet upward to melt away the 2,150 calories from that single meal. That does not indicate you’d remove it by walking 11,054 feet. You would need to climb a hill or a staircase that’s 11,054 feet high (or 2.09 miles high)! That’s over 3 quarters of the way up Mt. Whitney (which is the highest mountain in the continental US) in order to shed the calories from that single snack. The point of the story is not to climb a mountain every time you consume a meal, but instead to show that calories burned from extra exercise isn’t substantial than the calories that could be obtained in meals.
Due to this fact, several “aerobics” workout programs have not demonstrated a lot of effectiveness for helping people to lose weight. The best fat burning outcomes I’ve seen published are in the dozens of weight loss books by Ellington Darden, Ph.D. Darden uses an approach to losing weight which concentrates on proper eating routine and slow-motion high-intensity strength training. And, his fat loss groups do little, if any, “aerobic” training. In all of the years I have paid attention to physical fitness, I haven’t seen better effects documented elsewhere, and he has the standardized before and after images of his subjects throughout his books to show the efficiency of his approach.
If “aerobic” training resulted in a major contribution when it comes to losing weight, I’d hope to view evidence for it everywhere, because for decades that’s what the majority of the physical fitness industry has advocated for losing weight. You’d expect to find out a huge number of standardized before and after pictures of people performing primarily aerobics activities for losing fat and being successful at it, just like Darden’s before and after pictures from his weight training based programs. But I haven’t seen good examples of photographs like this from people involved in just an “aerobics” method. In fact, as review for an exercise book written in the 90’s, Edward Jackowski, Ph.D., interviewed over 1,000 women who were longtime enthusiastic participants of aerobics dance programs, and one question he asked was “How many females, including yourself, do you know who have ever enormously improved their body by taking aerobics sessions?” Amazingly, all of the women had the same answer: “Zero.”
In any event, a great moral to take away from my science professor’s computation is that changing eating patterns could possibly have the single largest effect for weight loss out of any approach an individual can use. In my own personal experience of shedding 50 lbs of excess fat and keeping it off for going on 18 years, I could tell you that diet plan has impacted my success with weight loss and maintenance above anything else. I used to jog, climb on the Stairmaster, and do other low-intensity “aerobic” activities because I believed they were necessary to get and stay slender. I presently consider those to have been one of the (many) faults that I’ve done in physical fitness. When I entirely eliminated jogging and other low-intensity “aerobic” activities from my workout routine, I didn’t get any fatter or any leaner, and I didn’t get any stronger or any weaker. The only real change in my body was that my joints started feeling better.
As a personal trainer Carlsbad, if you enjoy jogging or other low-intensity physical activities – more power to you. And successful resistance training could make you feel greater at those activities and perhaps make them more exciting for you too. Then again, I wouldn’t rely on them to help you lose fat. To burn body fat, diet program is most influential. And then strength training will help by shaping and firming your body, forces “discriminated weight loss” (weight loss, not muscle loss), and retains your metabolism as high as possible during and after the losing fat process. Trying to do added low-intensity “aerobic” activities won’t remove a sizeable amount of calories, and won’t perform much for the fat reduction process as an effect. So even for fat burning, 20 minutes, two times a week of high-intensity weight training is all the exercise you need.
Being in top shape through the help of personal trainer in Carlsbad not only improves your physique but also your overall health as well. The advantages that one can get from Carlsbad personal trainer are limitless.